Game 4, 2016-17
 |
| New revisions, open to more interpretation |
The new Fifa directives for this season
advise referees to control play not just according to the Laws of the Game, but
in "the spirit of the game" too. They could hardly have phrased it
more vaguely if they'd written, "Yeah, just go out and there and blow your
whistle whenever you feel the urge. Actually, we don't care any more what you
do. Most of our Laws are open to interpretation anyway. Do whatever the hell
you want."
Don't get me wrong. I'm not complaining. We
can interpret "the spirit of the game" any way we like, mainly to
suit ourselves. Can I kick the niggly midfielder who bleats about every
decision hard in the bollocks? That would seem, under the circumstances, to be in
the spirit of the game. Can I accept a bundle of hard currency in a brown
envelope to favour the team that discreetly placed the cash inside my sports
bag as I walked into the changing room? Sure. What could currently be more in
the spirit of the game than the richest team buying victory?
So anyway, to last night's cup game. First
round. The away team has as its honorary president a prominent
ex-parliamentarian and anarcho-communist revolutionary...
Want to read more? Click here to order Reffing Hell: Stuck In The Middle Of A Game Gone Wrong by Ian Plenderleith (Halcyon Publishing), published on August 8, 2022.
No comments:
Post a Comment